| 1 |
2009/3/30 Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:53:30 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> So as far as I see the new qt meta ebuild wasn't needed at any time. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> So every ebuild, in the tree and all overlays, was updated before the |
| 7 |
> split ebuilds were introduced? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I don't know the exact progress but I think the split ebuilds were |
| 11 |
introduced masked, then the dependencies have been adjusted |
| 12 |
accordingly. After the transition was done the ebuilds have been |
| 13 |
unmasked. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Regards, |
| 17 |
Daniel |
Archives