| 1 |
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:50 PM, pk <peterk2@××××××××.se> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2012-03-10 16:35, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I'm using the latest testing with a separate /usr and no problems. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> So udev-181 (masked) is ok to use without initrd and separate /usr |
| 7 |
> then? Thanks for the info! |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
That's one case; I would not take it for granted that it would work in |
| 10 |
any other case. The fact is, udev upstream does not support a |
| 11 |
separated /usr without an initramfs since . That Neil got it working |
| 12 |
may be a fluke, good luck, the phase of the moon, or all from above |
| 13 |
combined. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If you plan to keep a separated /usr and refuse to use an initramfs, I |
| 16 |
would recommend sticking to the last version *you* know for sure it |
| 17 |
works, or risk getting a nasty surprise at some upgrade. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Regards. |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 22 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
| 23 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives