| 1 |
On 10/26/22 12:04 PM, Ramon Fischer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Also a very interesting question! |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
}:-) |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> I just tested this with "visudo" and it does not intercept this. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Nor should it. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
It's perfect legitimate sudoers syntax. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
The location; /etc/sudoers.d/zzzzzzzzzz vs the end of /etc/sudoers |
| 13 |
(proper), doesn't matter. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> If "su" is disabled, you are locked out and you are forced to enter your |
| 16 |
> system via a live USB stick and a "chroot" in order to edit |
| 17 |
> "/etc/shadow" to set a root password via "mkpasswd" and enable "su". |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Which is one of the reasons that it's important to have (set) a known |
| 20 |
root password. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Grant. . . . |
| 26 |
unix || die |
Archives