1 |
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:20:04 -0700, gentuxx wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> >> Yeah, baselayout was one of the packages updated. |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > From what to what? genlop will tell you. If it was a path level |
6 |
> > update, it is unlikely anything has changed significantly in the |
7 |
> > configs. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> - From v1.11.15-r3 to v1.12.4-r2. How do I know if it was a "path level |
10 |
> update"? |
11 |
|
12 |
Sorry, typo. I meant to type "patch level upgrade", as in pkg-x.y.z-r1 to |
13 |
pkg-x.y.z-r4. |
14 |
|
15 |
There were some significant changes between baselayout 1.11 and 1.12, this |
16 |
is probably the cause of the problems. |
17 |
|
18 |
> > If you know which services were affected but didn't catch the exact |
19 |
> > messages, try stopping and starting them manually so the output |
20 |
> > doesn't get buried in all the other startup information. Setting |
21 |
> > RC_VERBOSE="yes" in /etc/conf.d/rc may help. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> The config files were accepted. There didn't appear to be any |
25 |
> significant changes which would have caused something like this. I'll |
26 |
> try the RC_ setting and see if that provides any more clues. |
27 |
|
28 |
It should do, with some scripts at least, but starting the services |
29 |
manually will also let you see what's going on. |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Neil Bothwick |
34 |
|
35 |
DCE seeks DTE for mutual exchange of data. |