| 1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 06:58:20 +0100, Mick wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>>> I'm beginning to think that openrc goes back to the "old" Linux way. |
| 6 |
>>> In other words, it uses the init levels instead of softlevels. |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>> Yes, this seems to be the case, although not in a clear way (otherwise |
| 9 |
>> why is softlevel=nonetwork working?) |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> man rc describes the built in runlevels and goes on to say "You should |
| 12 |
> not call any of these runlevels yourself". So maybe this is a design |
| 13 |
> decision rather than a bug, it would explain why a custom runlevel works. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
So do I need to create a runlevel called dalesboot and then just put the |
| 19 |
same stuff in it as is in the normal boot level? I have to say, that is |
| 20 |
weird. A runlevel should be used by both the system and available to |
| 21 |
the user as well. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Did I mention I can go to a console and use rc boot and it works? It's |
| 24 |
just when it comes from grub that it doesn't work. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Dale |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
:-) :-) |
Archives