Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] sun-jre-bin end-of-life - what now?
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:41:07
Message-Id: 5bdc1c8b0911091841k3565836fmb46928b34f4c54c4@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] sun-jre-bin end-of-life - what now? by Dale
1 On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > Mark Knecht wrote:
3 >> Hi,
4 >>    It seems that Gentoo-devs have decided that Sun Java is end-of-life
5 >> with security problems. I don't find any mention of this or what is
6 >> recommended on the Gentoo front page so I figured I'd ask what others
7 >> are doing for their machines.
8 >>
9 >> Thanks,
10 >> Mark
11 >>
12 >>
13 >
14 > I checked the changelog and it appears to be stable as of a few days ago.
15 >
16 > # ChangeLog for dev-java/sun-jre-bin
17 > # Copyright 1999-2009 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2
18 > # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-java/sun-jre-bin/ChangeLog,v
19 > 1.163 2009/11/05 21:28:43 maekke Exp $
20 >
21 >  05 Nov 2009; Markus Meier <maekke@g.o> sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.22.ebuild,
22 >  sun-jre-bin-1.6.0.17.ebuild:
23 >  amd64 stable, bug #291817
24 >
25 >  05 Nov 2009; Markus Meier <maekke@g.o> sun-jre-bin-1.6.0.17.ebuild:
26 >  x86 stable, bug #291817
27 >
28 >  05 Nov 2009; Markus Meier <maekke@g.o> sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.22.ebuild:
29 >  x86 stable, bug #291817
30 >
31 >
32 > I synced my tree yesterday so unless it was done today it looks like it
33 > is still there.  What kind of message are you getting?
34 >
35 > Dale
36 >
37 > :-)  :-)
38 >
39 >
40
41 Hi Dale,
42 If I remove the new ACCEPT_LICENSE="dlj-1.1" I added to make.conf
43 then I see this:
44
45 DesertFlower ~ # emerge -pv sun-jre-bin
46
47 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
48
49 Calculating dependencies... done!
50
51 !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "dev-java/sun-jre-bin" have been masked.
52 !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
53 - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.6.0.17 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
54 A copy of the 'dlj-1.1' license is located at '/usr/portage/licenses/dlj-1.1'.
55
56 - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.6.0.16 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s), ~x86 keyword)
57 - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.6.0.15 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
58 - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.22 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
59 - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.21 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s), ~x86 keyword)
60 - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.20 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
61 - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.4.2.19 (masked by: package.mask)
62 /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
63 # Vlastimil Babka <caster@g.o> (06 Nov 2009)
64 # Removal for EOL and security, bug #287615
65
66
67 For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge
68 man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
69
70 DesertFlower ~ #
71
72 Thanks,
73 Mark

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] sun-jre-bin end-of-life - what now? "John H. Moe" <johnmoe@××××××××××××.au>
Re: [gentoo-user] sun-jre-bin end-of-life - what now? Mike Edenfield <kutulu@××××××.org>