1 |
Holly Bostick wrote: |
2 |
> Why search Google and not b.g.o itself, or packages.gentoo.org? Either |
3 |
> manually or-- if you use Firefox-- using the Firefox b.g.o search |
4 |
> engine? Seems like a waste of effort to have to filter irrelevant hits |
5 |
> from Google when one already knows that the status of the issue will be |
6 |
> recorded on b.g.o (if a bug was filed and resolved) or |
7 |
> packages.gentoo.org (in the Changelog for the revision/update to pciutils). |
8 |
|
9 |
Because this is a pciutils issue, and has nothing to do with gentoo. The |
10 |
Changelog will only report a revision bump. |
11 |
Actually I did search b.g.o first, but there were no relevant results. Google |
12 |
turned out that debian had patched this some time ago, and now it is already |
13 |
included upstream. |
14 |
|
15 |
Christoph |
16 |
-- |
17 |
echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'<*>'|sed 's. ..'|tr "<*> !#:2" org@fr33z3 |
18 |
-- |
19 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |