| 1 |
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:52:39 AM Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 11 Mar 2015 06:42:35 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:20:25 AM Mick wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Tuesday 10 Mar 2015 23:33:33 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > > > Google only keeps the latest versions so that ebuild is usually only |
| 7 |
> > > > good for a short while after it gets marked stable. |
| 8 |
> > > > Just keyword the unstable package. |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > So users of the stable package have to be really fast, or lucky? |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Right. Or put emerge www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins --fetchonly on a |
| 13 |
> > cron job to fetch it as soon as it's stable. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I googled for it and downloaded it from a mirror. Am I correct that if the |
| 16 |
> hash is not right the ebuild will complain about it, or will I end up |
| 17 |
> installing a suspect package? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Yes. If you haven't found it... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzPt9N2PyrQGZTg5YXZYTTAzbms/view?usp=sharing |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Fernando Rodriguez |
Archives