Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc-5.0 ? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:15:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20150421201537.7e78f9a8@digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: gcc-5.0 ? by james |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:09:19 +0000 (UTC), james wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Do our overlay lists matchup completely? Does the -R always check |
| 4 | > the latest, or is their some updating syntax to ensure the "remotes" |
| 5 | > are updated? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | eix-remote update |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Neil Bothwick |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but |
| 14 | that's not why we do it. Richard Feynman |