1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:18 on Monday 17 January 2011, William |
2 |
Kenworthy did opine thusly: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:07 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
5 |
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 03:39 on Monday 17 January 2011, William |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Kenworthy did opine thusly: |
8 |
> > > On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 17:26 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: |
9 |
> > > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:13 PM, William Kenworthy |
10 |
> > > > <billk@×××××××××.au> |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > wrote: |
13 |
> > > > > On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 14:41 -0800, Grant wrote: |
14 |
> > > ... |
15 |
> > > |
16 |
> > > > I think that's well worded. He has insufficient memory when emerging. |
17 |
> > > > |
18 |
> > > > If he's really running short of DRAM Then he might also do well to |
19 |
> > > > boot to a console and do his emerges there. No memory given over to |
20 |
> > > > other things like KDE or browsers, etc. |
21 |
> > > > |
22 |
> > > > I am a bit surprised though that a -j1 type emerge would be running |
23 |
> > > > out of memory on a 3GB machine. I just finished emerge updates on a |
24 |
> > > > desktop with 4GB and only used 2.5GB which includes KDE, FIrefox and |
25 |
> > > > a |
26 |
> > > |
27 |
> > > > number of other things: |
28 |
> > > I have a diskless 3GB ram atom system (mythtv frontend) and I have to |
29 |
> > > arrange swap over nbd for gcc and glibc emerges - others just get very |
30 |
> > > slow when getting to limits, or get flaky unless -j1 is used. Havent |
31 |
> > > tried OO on it yet :) |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> > I'M flabbergasted. 3G is really a gigantic amount of memory and yet the |
34 |
> > machine still runs out of the stuff? |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > Something is seriously wrong somewhere when code does this. I know memory |
37 |
> > is cheap and all, but still ... that's just excessive |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Your behind the times Alan - 3G was a huge amount 10 years ago ... |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
Not so much :-) |
43 |
|
44 |
I too have db servers with 96G of ram. 5 of them, so I'm current. I'm just |
45 |
gobsmacked that a desktop needs 3G to build a compiler and system libs. It's |
46 |
consuming 2G to do that, I'll bet that 1.75G of that is pure wastage. |
47 |
|
48 |
Much like authors who proudly declare that they spent 7 years writing some |
49 |
magnum opus. It's a sure bet they were drunk of 6.5 of them :-) |
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
-- |
55 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |