| 1 |
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Tom H <tomh0665@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Thursday 27 August 2015 08:49:13 Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Michel Catudal <mcatudal@×××××××.net> |
| 5 |
>>>> |
| 6 |
>>>> I've had serious problems in the past getting [grub2] to install on a |
| 7 |
>>>> partition and gave up. Is that bug fixed? It insists on installing on the |
| 8 |
>>>> MBR which is unacceptable. |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> It's not a bug, and it won't be "fixed". Installing on a partition is |
| 11 |
>>> simply not supported. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> So now grub2 is insisting on being the only boot manager present. That doesn't |
| 14 |
>> sound like the Linux way to me. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Linux is horrendously restrictive; you can only boot from one kernel at a time! |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I get the joke but: |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/ |
| 22 |
http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Main_Page |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Rich |
Archives