Archives
Archives
| From: | Bertrand Jacquin <beber.gentoo@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] post-tetex? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 30 May 2006 20:38:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | 43872d370605301239g7d56bdd8scd1eac9881af4f5@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] post-tetex? by Jorge Almeida |
||
| 1 | On 5/30/06, Jorge Almeida <jalmeida@××××××××××××.pt> wrote: |
| 2 | > Anyone has any idea about what will be the gentoo way to cope with the |
| 3 | > no-more-tetex issue? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Have a look on http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615/match=gentoo+dev+tetex |
| 6 | |
| 7 | -- |
| 8 | Beber |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] post-tetex? | Jorge Almeida <jalmeida@××××××××××××.pt> |