| 1 |
· Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net>: |
| 2 |
> Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 3 |
>> · Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net>: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
>> Yep; snapshot to be exact. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Then I'll try to match up with that, though I may not use the feature. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Well, if you don't use it and don't plan to use it, then I'd suggest |
| 11 |
to not compile it in (not even as a module). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Then again, I might. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
In that case, I'd suggest to enable the module or compile the feature |
| 16 |
into the kernel, when you use that feature. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
>> I also fail to understand, how that question (kernel configuration, here: |
| 19 |
>> "to module, or not to module") is related to LVM. To make that clear, I'm |
| 20 |
>> implying that there's no connection at all. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> It wasn't really. I just noticed the how to said modules |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I suppose, it said so, as kernels are often compiled so, that they |
| 26 |
use modules. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> I don't know why I don't use them |
| 29 |
> either. I just never did. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
;) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
BOFH Excuse #384: |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
it's an ID-10-T error |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives