1 |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Oct 18, 2011 12:22 AM, "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
<SNIP> |
5 |
>> Now, in general, don't mix 'em, but here's my package.keywords file |
6 |
>> for my compute server:: |
7 |
>> |
8 |
<SNIP> |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Most of this is due to me wanting newer versions but I think a few may |
11 |
>> not have stable versions at all, or didn't when I first installed |
12 |
>> them. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> - Mark |
15 |
>> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> That seems short ;-) |
18 |
> |
19 |
> My package.accepted_keyword file is already longer than 80 lines... without |
20 |
> X or any GUI :-P |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I'm such a control freak -.- |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Rgds, |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
Yeah, I imagine for lots of people this list looks short. For Meino it |
28 |
might look huge. In my case all my machines (8 of them) run stable |
29 |
mainly because I like the stability it gives me. I then add only the |
30 |
few ~amd64 things I think I that specific machine needs, and in the |
31 |
case of this thread, a package or two that require babysitting until |
32 |
the devs get caught up. |
33 |
|
34 |
I try to run eix-test-obsolete after every update to catch when they |
35 |
fix things, as in the case of dev-lang/R. When the version I have |
36 |
installed becomes stable I try to remember to remove the corresponding |
37 |
entry from package.keywords, but I don't always remember. |
38 |
|
39 |
- Mark |