1 |
Thanks Alan (and everyone else), |
2 |
|
3 |
One important follow-up below... |
4 |
|
5 |
On 9/29/2015 8:28 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> It would be wise to clarify with the devs exactly what it is they are |
7 |
> looking for. |
8 |
|
9 |
That is the purpose of my upcoming phone call with him. |
10 |
|
11 |
> And overall, in your shoes I would be firm, adamant and above all polite |
12 |
> and say that infrastructure changes go through you and you alone, and |
13 |
> must be vetted by you with full transparency. |
14 |
|
15 |
That is what I've been doing so far, but I think the boss is getting |
16 |
close to just saying 'give it to them'... |
17 |
|
18 |
But - no one has addressed my main question... |
19 |
|
20 |
I understand that 301 redirects are performed by web servers only, you |
21 |
can't really do these in DNS. However, some Managed DNS providers - |
22 |
DNSMadeEasy included - offer this ability as a service. DNSMadeEasy |
23 |
calls them 'http redirects', and the actual redirect is accomplished by |
24 |
one of their own web servers they have set up to handle these. |
25 |
|
26 |
Is it 'normal' to do these 301 redirects at the DNS level like that? I |
27 |
would think they should be using the current web server hosting the |
28 |
current site to start doing the redirects as they get the new landing |
29 |
pages done? Apache does this using a .htaccess file (if I'm interpreting |
30 |
my googling responses correctly). |
31 |
|
32 |
And now that I worded it that way - how would they do that exactly? |
33 |
Would the proper method be to redirect it to a new test domain, ie: |
34 |
|
35 |
www.example.com/page1.htm >> www.new-example.com/newpage1.htm ? |
36 |
|
37 |
Or save the new page on the old server, then do: |
38 |
|
39 |
www.example.com/page1.htm >> www.example.com/newpage1.htm ? |
40 |
|
41 |
Now I'm confusing myself... |