Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] fsck and mount by label
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:08:48
Message-Id: 4E351B05.5040805@binarywings.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] fsck and mount by label by Michael Mol
1 Am 30.07.2011 16:01, schrieb Michael Mol:
2 > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net> wrote:
3 >> Hello list!
4 >>
5 >> I've noticed the following in my rc.log file:
6 >> [file system mounting ...]
7 >> opt: clean, 3127/6496 files, 108510/209920 blocks
8 >> fsck.ext4: Unable to resolve »LABEL=backup«
9 >> * Operational error
10 >>
11 >> The backup disk is the only one (besides boot and root) which is mounted
12 >> by label. After booting, I find that the backup disk was mounted
13 >> correctly. If I then try to run
14 >> `fsck.ext4 "LABEL=backup"`, it works as expected.
15 >>
16 >> Does anyone have an explanation for this?
17 >
18 > Could it be that the volume 'backup' is on isn't available yet? (i.e.
19 > brought up by lvm later in the boot process)
20 >
21
22 I thought of this, as well, especially because it is a firewire disk.
23 But then why is it mounted correctly?
24
25 Regards,
26 Florian Philipp

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] fsck and mount by label Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>