| 1 |
On 8 Feb 2009, at 13:39, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:51:00 +0200, Danis Petkakis wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> ok thank you for your response...will do as suggested... |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> The suggestion was not to top-post... |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
He was replying to one of my messages, and I did not suggest that. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I was actually slightly narked at having to futz around with the |
| 11 |
previous message - which did not make any sense the first time I read |
| 12 |
it, so no doubt it made no sense at all to a less-capable English |
| 13 |
speaker - copying & pasting 6 times, just so that Nikos could make a |
| 14 |
"clever" point. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I do not object to top-posting myself, but I find that Danis Petkakis' |
| 17 |
habit of "opposite posting" (posting at the top when all previous |
| 18 |
replies have been at the bottom, or posting at the bottom when all |
| 19 |
previous replies have been at the top) makes his posts very difficult |
| 20 |
to read. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
But we cannot blame him for doing so because nobody has taken the time |
| 23 |
to *patiently* explain what he's doing wrong, or point him to a URL |
| 24 |
that does so. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Stroller. |
Archives