From: | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] encrypting emails on more than one email account with same keys | ||
Date: | Fri, 24 May 2019 07:14:21 | ||
Message-Id: | 4523282.gONTUWoyms@dell_xps | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] encrypting emails on more than one email account with same keys by Grant Taylor |
1 | On Friday, 24 May 2019 04:58:02 BST Grant Taylor wrote: |
2 | > On 5/23/19 9:49 PM, mad.scientist.at.large@××××××××.com wrote: |
3 | > > I suspect most lawyers would agree that email is just a bad idea |
4 | > > if confidentiality matters, or the web in general frankly and it's |
5 | > > getting worse fast. |
6 | |
7 | Yes, face to face seems to work best, but it is not always convenient/ |
8 | possible. |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | > I find that S/MIME works quite well for me. It's also largely |
12 | > transparent once it's configured. |
13 | |
14 | ... And with 'eFail' the same could end up happening with the previously |
15 | encrypted text! |
16 | |
17 | https://www.paubox.com/blog/pgp-smime-efail-flaw |
18 | https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/122919/ |
19 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/683034 |
20 | |
21 | -- |
22 | Regards, |
23 | Mick |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |