1 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:19:08 -0400, covici@××××××××××.com wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > Hi. On my latest update of world, I have a few blockers which I am |
6 |
> > unable to figure out how to solve -- I will put the related output below |
7 |
> > with inserted comments. I am using "unstable" gentooand I have masked |
8 |
> > ncurses-6 for the time being. Portage also wants to downgrade my |
9 |
> > systemd from 221(0/2) to 219_p112(0/2). |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > [blocks B ] sys-apps/systemd[gudev(-)] |
12 |
> > ("sys-apps/systemd[gudev(-)]" is blocking dev-libs/libgudev-230) |
13 |
> > [blocks B ] sys-apps/sysvinit ("sys-apps/sysvinit" is blocking |
14 |
> > sys-apps/systemd-219_p112) [blocks B ] dev-libs/libgudev |
15 |
> > ("dev-libs/libgudev" is blocking sys-apps/systemd-219_p112) |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> You have omitted some important information before this, but the problem |
18 |
> you have is that something is trying to pull in libgudev, which is |
19 |
> provided by systemd and well, hence the blocker. Packages should depend on |
20 |
> virtual/libgudev, which avoids this type of conflict. Run the update |
21 |
> again --tree to see just what is trying to install libgudev. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> > Total: 75 packages (64 upgrades, 1 downgrade, 7 new, 2 in new slots, 1 |
24 |
> > reinstall), Size of downloads: 273,248 KiB Conflict: 3 blocks (3 |
25 |
> > unsatisfied) |
26 |
> |
27 |
> In this situation, with so many packages being updated, I try to reduce |
28 |
> the noise from portage by emerge --oneshot-ing anything in the list that |
29 |
> is not related to the blockers, it makes the tree output much easier to |
30 |
> work with. |
31 |
|
32 |
OK, I will try that, I thought it would tell me what is pulling libgudev |
33 |
in. |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
37 |
How do |
38 |
you spend it? |
39 |
|
40 |
John Covici |
41 |
covici@××××××××××.com |