| 1 |
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:10:30 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> While I agree that this might not have been the most clever |
| 4 |
> idea "they" ever had, I would like to point your nose to |
| 5 |
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/baselayout-2.0.0.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Now it makes sense. If you have not modified conf.d/net since the last |
| 8 |
baselayout emerge, portage considers the file to be part of the old |
| 9 |
package and removes it. That's why only some machines are affected. It |
| 10 |
also shows that this is not a bug with the new baselayout but a time |
| 11 |
bomb in the 1.x ebuilds. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
No maintenance: Impossible to fix. |
Archives