Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now?
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:47:19
Message-Id: 4E020CF8.7040405@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? by Neil Bothwick
1 Neil Bothwick wrote:
2 > On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:27:11 -0500, Dale wrote:
3 >
4 >
5 >>> That's because those are global flags. If you set package-specific
6 >>> flags in /etc/portage/package.use, eix-test-obsolete will tell you
7 >>> when entries can be removed.
8 >>>
9 >
10 >> But when something new comes out, I usually want to add it for all the
11 >> packages. I have a few things listed in package.use but I don't want
12 >> to clutter the crap out of it and then have two files that needs
13 >> cleaning.
14 >>
15 > Use a directory for package.use, it makes it far easier to manage. All
16 > of /etc/portage/package.* are directories here.
17 >
18 >
19
20 I have done that for package.keywords and unmask. In ways it is easier
21 but in ways, it is a nightmare. If something is unmasked, I have to go
22 find the file that unmasked it. I have several since I use autounmask
23 for most of it. Then add in that the new autounmask part of emerge
24 seems to pick a random file to add too. At that point, not much makes
25 sense anymore.
26
27 < sighs > I don't think there is any really easy way to do this except
28 to just run stable. o_O
29
30 Dale
31
32 :-) :-)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>