Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is there a way to automate rsync of updated portage tree across multiple boxes without each having to pull it down from a gentoo mirror
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:24:26
Message-Id: 20080916142422.64bfd667@digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Is there a way to automate rsync of updated portage tree across multiple boxes without each having to pull it down from a gentoo mirror by Vaeth
1 On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:49:36 +0200 (CEST), Vaeth wrote:
2
3 > > Leaving aside the difficulties of faking a LAN IP from the public side
4 > > of the router, or even the fact that the router may have the rsync
5 > > ports closed, what is so secret about the contents of the portage
6 > > tree?
7 >
8 > It is always better to have a port not open than to rely on a router
9 > to "close" it apparently.
10
11 If you are using NAT on the router, you have to explicitly forward that
12 port somewhere for it to work. I use an rsync server on my network, but it
13 is inaccessible from the Internet.
14
15
16 --
17 Neil Bothwick
18
19 Guns don't kill people--it's those little pieces of lead.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature