| 1 |
Mark Knecht wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Neil Bothwick<neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
> <SNIP> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>>> No! It is not the latest. It's just what portage is offering you. The |
| 7 |
>>>> link I sent you clearly (!?) stated that you need to be running the |
| 8 |
>>>> latest 'Certified' driver revision 275.09.07 to get this fix. Just |
| 9 |
>>>> because the Gentoo devs haven't marked it as stable does (to me) mean |
| 10 |
>>>> that I should take their word for it. |
| 11 |
>>>> |
| 12 |
>> If Nvidia say to use the later version because they know the current |
| 13 |
>> arch version is broken, you should follow their advice and not ignore it |
| 14 |
>> simply because of a keyword setting in the ebuild. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> -- |
| 18 |
>> Neil Bothwick |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
> And of course I would screw up my response by writing |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> [QUOTE] |
| 23 |
> Just because the Gentoo devs haven't marked it as stable |
| 24 |
> does (to me) mean that I should take their word for it. |
| 25 |
> [/QUOTE] |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> instead of what I meant, which would have been |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> [SUBSTITUTE] |
| 30 |
> Just because the Gentoo devs haven't marked it as stable |
| 31 |
> ***DOESN'T*** (to me) mean that I should take their word for it. |
| 32 |
> [/SUBSTITUTE] |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Sorry! |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> - Mark |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
WOW !!! I'm not the only one that leaves out the word NOT. Funny how |
| 41 |
that three letter word can change the meaning of a sentence so much. It |
| 42 |
seems to turn things on its head so to speak. ;-) |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Dale |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
:-) :-) |
Archives