Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Franz Fellner <alpine.art.de@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Dolphin only allowing a single instance after update
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:30:13
Message-Id: CADtyuE58-veWKxzu+-gUh+vMaqx3rd-g_-1-TzxsPFJfwqAQTw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Dolphin only allowing a single instance after update by Dale
1 You might want to have a play with kbuildsycoca5 after editing .desktop
2 files.
3 Look at the options (--help I think, or --help-all), I can't help with that
4 ATM.
5 It should rebuild the system config cache - reparse the .desktop files.
6
7 Good luck
8 Franz
9
10 Am Fr., 23. Aug. 2019 um 12:49 Uhr schrieb Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>:
11
12 > Mick wrote:
13 > > On Friday, 23 August 2019 05:56:07 BST Dale wrote:
14 > >> It seems it is hardcoded to do this at the moment.
15 > >> This seriously makes me want to start using another file manager. I
16 > >> don't mind someone testing new features but at the very least, have it
17 > >> where it can be disabled for those who do not want it or are set up not
18 > >> to need it.
19 > > You're missing the point! As soon as something works as most users
20 > want, or
21 > > becoming used to at any rate, the KDE devs will <aheam!> /improve/ their
22 > > software by breaking its most desired functionality - sometimes
23 > irrepairably.
24 > > LOL!
25 > >
26 > > Konqueror was the best file manager ever, with multiple vertical and
27 > > horizontal window split, with kio-slaves which would process or play
28 > anything
29 > > and everything you threw at it, with browser integration, ftp/s and
30 > sftp/fish,
31 > > etc. Nope, evidently konqueror wasn't good enough, so here comes
32 > dolphin
33 > > which can't do half of what konqueror was able to offer us. I better
34 > not
35 > > mention kmail2, because I don't want anyone to think this message was
36 > written
37 > > by Edgar Allan Poe. :-(
38 > >
39 >
40 >
41 > I hear you very clearly. I had my desktop set up just like I needed it
42 > so that I didn't have to spend time navigating to things. Bad thing is,
43 > by the time I figured out it was clobbering already running instances, I
44 > had closed some tabs/windows and lost my place. On a couple of them,
45 > there is no way for me to know where I left off. When I stop editing
46 > pictures or videos for example, I always highlight or select the last
47 > one I did. If I'm going to logout or something, I write all that info
48 > down so I know where I left off. When a tab gets closed and I don't
49 > write it down, no clue where I was at. It's one reason I had to wait a
50 > bit to logout and back in to test that patch. I had to get to a
51 > stopping place and not be downloading anything either. It takes time to
52 > get to that spot. This new feature really messed me up. If they going
53 > to release some change like this, they should warn people about it.
54 > Sort of like Gentoo's news item or something and already have a way to
55 > do it the old way.
56 >
57 > I remember Konqueror. It's still around I think but a lot of things are
58 > broken or removed last I looked. Thing is, you could do a LOT of things
59 > with that one tool. Need to copy from another system, no problem. Need
60 > it done securely, still not a problem. Need a plain file manager, no
61 > problem. That thing was powerful to say the least. Honestly, I still
62 > miss the thing. I really liked running it as root as a file manager. I
63 > never used it to access the internet as root but as a file manager, it
64 > was awesome. Dolphin started to stink so much, I switched to Krusader.
65 >
66 > Yea, those were the days. lol
67 >
68 > Dale
69 >
70 > :-) :-)
71 >
72 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Dolphin only allowing a single instance after update Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>