| 1 |
On 03/29/2017 10:42 PM, tuxic@××××××.de wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Before doing the wrong decision: |
| 5 |
> How "secure" is it to use fsck of busybox in a limited environment |
| 6 |
> (SoC) to check sdcard partitions (etx4) occasionally instead of using |
| 7 |
> fsck.ext4 ? |
| 8 |
> Does someone has some experiences with this ? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Thanks a lot in advance for any help! |
| 11 |
> Cheers |
| 12 |
> Meino |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The fsck applet provided by busybox is just the fsck(8) driver, which |
| 19 |
calls the fsck.${FSTYPE} command to actually check the filesystem. You |
| 20 |
still need fsck.ext4/e2fsck from e2fsprogs to actually do the check. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Jonathan Callen |
Archives