| 1 |
On Sunday 24 Jun 2012 15:12:10 Jarry wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> I have just checked my machines and I found I have basically |
| 4 |
> two groups of settings ("ls -al" in /var/log/portage/elog/): |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> A) |
| 7 |
> drwxrws--- 2 portage root 4096 Jun 24 03:10 . |
| 8 |
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 7 2009 .. |
| 9 |
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 portage root 57760 Jun 22 15:11 summary.log |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> B) |
| 12 |
> drwxrwsr-x 2 portage portage 4096 Jun 24 13:30 . |
| 13 |
> drwxrws--- 3 portage portage 4096 Nov 3 2011 .. |
| 14 |
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 portage portage 1132 Jun 22 17:28 summary.log |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Not only "summary.log", but also /var/log/portage/ and |
| 17 |
> /var/log/portage/elog/ have quite different permissions. |
| 18 |
> I'm sure I never changed it manually, the only difference |
| 19 |
> is that "A" group has been installed 3 yers ago, while "B" |
| 20 |
> just recently (but both regulary updated). |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> So is the "B-version" correct one? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Jarry |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
This was installed more than 2 years ago. I can't recall if I tweaked |
| 27 |
ownerships. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
# ls -la /var/log/portage/elog |
| 30 |
total 132 |
| 31 |
drwxrws--- 2 portage root 4096 Jun 17 10:08 . |
| 32 |
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 81920 Jun 24 16:00 .. |
| 33 |
-rw-rw-r-- 1 portage root 17300 Jun 24 15:06 summary.log |
| 34 |
-rw-rw-r-- 1 portage root 3695 May 27 08:48 summary.log-20120527.gz |
| 35 |
-rw-rw-r-- 1 portage root 1346 Jun 3 07:40 summary.log-20120603.gz |
| 36 |
-rw-rw-r-- 1 portage root 1045 Jun 5 23:32 summary.log-20120610.gz |
| 37 |
-rw-rw-r-- 1 portage root 5713 Jun 16 08:07 summary.log-20120617 |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Regards, |
| 40 |
Mick |
Archives