| 1 |
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 03/29/2011 07:11 AM, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Either I'm doing something wrong, or the new bugzilla version at |
| 5 |
>>> bugs.gentoo.org really sucks at searching. Let's for example go here: |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/query.cgi?format=specific |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> and select "All" for "Status". Then search for "kde-base/kdelibs". It |
| 10 |
>>> takes a *lot* of time to complete, and worse, it returns a hell of a |
| 11 |
>>> lot of results that have nothing whatsoever to do with the search |
| 12 |
>>> query. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> Did no one else notice? |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> I went to the link and just typed in "kdelibs". They look relevant to |
| 19 |
>> me. They all had kdelibs in it anyway. I was to lazy to type in the rest |
| 20 |
>> since I also don't think it is needed. I mean, kdelibs is unique, no |
| 21 |
>> other package has that name that I know of. Maybe the "/" throws it off |
| 22 |
>> or something. |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> Maybe your bug search skills are like my google search skills. lol |
| 25 |
>> Please take that as a joke. :-) |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> You missed the select "All" for "Status" part. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I did select "all" and it seems to work fine with the way I searched. |
| 31 |
At the bottom of one huge list, it says this: |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
"3097 bugs found" |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Looks like a lot to me. If I don't do "all", it only finds 84. Those |
| 36 |
would be open bugs since that is the default. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Dale |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
:-) :-) |
Archives