| 1 |
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 13:34:42 -0400, John Covici wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Hi. 23.2 is broke and has a mandatory new format where you have to |
| 4 |
> put -s before the signal when using killall. Killall is not finding |
| 5 |
> existing process even though I have the name correct. Downgrading to |
| 6 |
> 23.1-r1 fixes the problem. I just thought I'd let people know. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
The -s does not appear to be mandatory here, it still sends SIGTERM by |
| 9 |
default. However, I have got a 'no process found' error with some |
| 10 |
processes, which now require killall `which processname` to work. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in |
| 17 |
trouble again |
Archives