1 |
>>>> I'm getting strange results from xdpyinfo. I always get 96x96 DPI and |
2 |
>>>> the screen size changes along with the resolution. When I run 'xrandr |
3 |
>>>> --dpi 200x200' and check xdpyinfo, it reports correctly. But if I log |
4 |
>>>> out and back in to xfce4 without doing anything else, it gives me |
5 |
>>>> 96x96 again. |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> XFCE is probably forcing 96DPI by default. This is usually done by |
10 |
>>> desktop |
11 |
>>> environments that don't support DPI scaling very well. I just found this |
12 |
>>> (sort of flame-war-ish) thread: |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> https://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?id=7734 |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> and indeed XFCE doesn't seem to have very good support for this. Maybe |
17 |
>>> you |
18 |
>>> can find some of the settings listed there useful though. |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>>> Other than that, if you want working DPI scaling, you'll have much better |
21 |
>>> luck with KDE 5 / Plasma. |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> Won't I freak out if I'm an xfce4 guy and I try to switch to KDE? Is |
25 |
>> there a better choice for HiDPI migration for people who like xfce4? |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> You could try LXQt, which is the upcoming replacement for LXDE. It's |
29 |
> Qt-based, so DPI scaling *should* work well (no guarantees, didn't try it |
30 |
> myself yet.) And its desktop philosophy is more similar to XFCE, meaning |
31 |
> minimalist, non-bloated UIs. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Anyway, if I were you, I'd just try all of them using live-CDs/USBs from |
34 |
> various distros, and see what works best. LXDE, LXQt, Gnome, KDE, Budgie, |
35 |
> those seem to be the main ones right now. |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
Great tips, thank you Nikos. |
39 |
|
40 |
- Grant |