| 1 |
It is a curious thing: apparently portage doesn't think /etc/gtk-2.0 |
| 2 |
belongs to any package: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
[10:19 PM]wwong ~ $ equery belongs /etc/gtk-2.0/ |
| 5 |
[ Searching for file(s) /etc/gtk-2.0/ in *... ] |
| 6 |
[10:20 PM]wwong ~ $ |
| 7 |
[10:20 PM]wwong ~ $ equery belongs /etc/gtk |
| 8 |
[ Searching for file(s) /etc/gtk in *... ] |
| 9 |
x11-libs/gtk+-1.2.10-r11 (/etc/gtk) |
| 10 |
[10:21 PM]wwong ~ $ |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That might be the reason it was not packaged... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
W |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:52:21PM +0000, rodrigo lazo wrote: |
| 17 |
> Hi, |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I have two machines, and portage only in one of them. They share |
| 20 |
> portage and have exactly the same configuration, one compiles and the |
| 21 |
> other uses packages from the other. When I installed acroread I ran |
| 22 |
> into problems |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I ran quickpkg gtk+ and everything worked fine, the other installed |
| 25 |
> gtk+ and the same with acroread. But when I run acroread in the second |
| 26 |
> one a lot of messages about missing /etc/gkt-2.0. And its true, the |
| 27 |
> package didn't have that directory but the computer that compiled it |
| 28 |
> do |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Why is that? |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
"What are you talking about? " |
| 37 |
"Never mind, eat the fruit. " |
| 38 |
"You know, this place almost looks like the Garden of Eden. |
| 39 |
" |
| 40 |
"Eat the fruit. " |
| 41 |
"Sounds quite like it too. " |
| 42 |
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 36 days, 5:24 |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives