| 1 |
On Friday, December 15, 2017 2:25:29 AM CET Marc Joliet wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 02:12:08 CET schrieb R0b0t1: |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > On Thursday, 14 December 2017 16:03:19 GMT Ian Zimmerman wrote: |
| 7 |
> > >> I'll try not to feed this monster thread any longer, I promise. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > Ah, but will you succeed? :) |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > List, in my weakness, I felt compelled to make the 77th post, as seven |
| 12 |
> > is a holy number indeed. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
7 doesn't have any holes, so it can't be holy... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> > Cheers, |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > R0b0t1 |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Hah, and *right* before I sent my own monster mail, too! So it seems I'm |
| 21 |
> poor number 78... (and 79 now, too, I guess) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
8 and 9 do have holes... |
| 24 |
you made a holy number :) |
Archives