1 |
On 28 Nov 2008, at 16:31, Florian Philipp wrote: |
2 |
> ... |
3 |
> I'm wondering, why is Windows that bad in this regard? Of course, |
4 |
> FAT* is bad, but what's about NTFS? It is at least as modern as most |
5 |
> Linux FS and has some nice features. Surely MS should be capable of |
6 |
> implementing the same allocation algorithms we use. Or is NTFS |
7 |
> really not bad in this regard and it's all just that people mix |
8 |
> experiences with FAT* with NTFS? |
9 |
|
10 |
No, NTFS *is* really bad in that regard. I've seen it HORRIBLY |
11 |
fragmented, and defragging it make a REMARKABLE difference. At least |
12 |
the nice thing is that Defrag not only fixes you the problem, but also |
13 |
shows it before you run it. |
14 |
|
15 |
Stroller. |