| 1 |
On Sep 21, 2014 5:10 PM, "Tom H" <tomh0665@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@×××××.com> |
| 4 |
wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Point is he's trying to paint the picture that systemd folks rattle on |
| 7 |
and |
| 8 |
> > on about its speed, but they don't. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The speed argument/anti-argument can be traced back to Lennart's first |
| 11 |
> blog post on systemd (IIRC "rethinking pid 1") where he touted its |
| 12 |
> speeding up of the boot process. The reason that's regularly brought |
| 13 |
> up is that there aren't (m)any purely technical counterpoints to |
| 14 |
> systemd so boot speed (and binary logs but the latter can be disabled |
| 15 |
> with setting "Storage=none" in "journald.conf" and setting up a socket |
| 16 |
> for syslog to store the logs) are targeted. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Im well aware of Lennart talking about it but the relevant matter is |
| 19 |
whether it was ever brought up in the conversation or not. If youre saying |
| 20 |
its on me to prove a claim you better be fucking sure i made or care about |
| 21 |
the claim in the first place. And on this list its consistently the |
| 22 |
anti-fanboys that make the claim, because even Lennart himself doesnt |
| 23 |
emphasize the speed as much as is imagined - he often mentions it as a mere |
| 24 |
side effect of a "clean" bootup. Id link you the posts that say so if i |
| 25 |
werent on a moving train. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> |
Archives