| 1 |
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:18:30AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Can you find one example of any situation where the linux kernel has |
| 5 |
>> ever required any specific implementation of anything in userspace as |
| 6 |
>> a matter of policy in its 23 year history? I'm sure you could find |
| 7 |
>> some examples of cases where there just happened to be one de-facto |
| 8 |
>> implementation of something, but even that might be tough with all the |
| 9 |
>> diversity in the linux world. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> It might not be an official official requirement, but if the upstream |
| 12 |
> gets rolled into systemd, then we depend on the "goodwill" of systemd |
| 13 |
> devs not to go and break anybody else's userspace implementation. |
| 14 |
> Lennart and "goodwill" do not belong in the same sentence. How's |
| 15 |
> systemd-shim working out for Debian? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Do you have any reason to think that it isn't working out? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The systemd-shim and cgmanager developers have to play catch up but |
| 20 |
I'm using both on Debian and Ubuntu and they're OK. |
Archives