| 1 |
On 1/8/08, Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@××××.dk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008 23:30:51 Kevin O'Gorman wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > > However, it is true that emerge sync and eix-update were in two |
| 5 |
> > > > separate jobs scheduled an hour apart. It is vaguely conceivable |
| 6 |
> > > > that they got out of step somehow. I've unified them, and hope |
| 7 |
> > > > things go better now. |
| 8 |
> [...] |
| 9 |
> > > Any particular reason you run two separate jobs and not just eix-sync |
| 10 |
> > > (which does both in sequence)? |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Originally, because the output was hard to read I think. And I figured |
| 13 |
> > that starting them an hour apart would ensure sequence anyway. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Surely you ran update-eix and possibly diff-eix rather than eix-sync then? |
| 16 |
> Running eix-sync and emerge --sync would mean syncing twice a day (for no |
| 17 |
> good reason)... |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> -- |
| 20 |
> Bo Andresen |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Indeed. I run update-eix, but I don't do it every day. The entire package |
| 24 |
runs three times per week, and I use the emails from it to decide whether or |
| 25 |
when to emerge world. I keep pretty current, but don't see the point in |
| 26 |
daily updates. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
++ kevin |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD |
Archives