Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: This Connection is Untrusted: WAS: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:13:03
Message-Id: ji6h2s$b11$1@dough.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] This Connection is Untrusted: WAS: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86 by Mark Knecht
1 On 24/02/12 00:59, Mark Knecht wrote:
2 > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Paul Hartman
3 > <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Willie WY Wong<wongwwy@××××××××××.org> wrote:
5 >>> Actually, why is it that upstream does not provide 64bit binaries? (It
6 >>> always bothers me to see my wife's Windows 7 machines running a copy
7 >>> of firefox marked, in parenthesis, 32 bit.)
8 >>
9 >> They're working on it... They actually have started generating 64-bit
10 >> nightly builds for Windows and Linux:
11 >> https://nightly.mozilla.org/
12 >
13 > What is it about my systems wherein every one of these https links
14 > case my systems to barf with a "This Connection is Untrusted" message.
15 > If I remove the 's' then things work fine.
16 >
17 > Is there some part of Gentoo config that should take care of this but
18 > that I don't know about?
19
20 Nope, you can't do anything about that. The warning appears because
21 Mozilla is using a certificate that was issued for "www.mozilla.org" and
22 "mozilla.org", but the actual domain is "nightly.mozilla.org". You
23 always get a warning when that happens.
24
25 HTTP does not use encryption and certificates, so in that case you will
26 never get anything like that.