Archives
Archives
| From: | Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:47:21 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEH5T2MCtYTMMPQBJb7dOS-ispigRRsMbu_mWz-w3jxwrRwJ9w@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced? by Mick |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to emerge and |
| 3 | > on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on |
| 6 | my system but I haven't paid attention to temp space needed during the |
| 7 | emerge process. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced? | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |