Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Franklin Wang <touch21st@×××××.com>
To: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@×××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:36:14
Message-Id: 530701D4.8000905@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment? by Andrew Savchenko
1 Thanks for your help. The choice for HPC can be more free. I prepare to
2 try it in datacenter, for FTP first, and then web server, mail server
3 and so forth. Of course, I still think it's better to use rhel or suse
4 for database, CRM and others.
5
6 On 2014年02月20日 22:35, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
7 > Hi,
8 >
9 > On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 07:40:59 +0800 Franklin Wang wrote:
10 >> I'm not familiar with gentoo server and cluster. So could you tell me
11 >> the experience about them? Thanks.
12 > We have successful experience with Gentoo on both production servers
13 > (someone call this area "enterprise", though I dislike such name) and
14 > HPC setups.
15 >
16 > In short,
17 > Procs:
18 > - fine-tuned setups;
19 > - really large choice of components;
20 > - high-performance setups (especially rocks for HPC);
21 > - reduced attack surface;
22 > - nontrivial attack surface;
23 > - large system updates easy (comparted to e.g. RHEL4 -> RHEL5
24 > migration);
25 > - easier to add and maintain out-of-tree software.
26 > Cons:
27 > - much longer time for initial setup;
28 > - harder to apply routine updates;
29 > - poorly suitable for tasks like: "create me this new service ASAP
30 > (for which you don't have prepared images), preferably yesterday".
31 > Other notes:
32 > - requires more qualified personnel to maintain.
33 >
34 > Best regards,
35 > Andrew Savchenko
36
37 --
38 skype:touch21st, Gtalk:touch21st, Yahoo/MSN:franklinwang36@×××××.com,
39 Xing/Linkedin:Franklin Wang