1 |
Thanks for your help. The choice for HPC can be more free. I prepare to |
2 |
try it in datacenter, for FTP first, and then web server, mail server |
3 |
and so forth. Of course, I still think it's better to use rhel or suse |
4 |
for database, CRM and others. |
5 |
|
6 |
On 2014年02月20日 22:35, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
7 |
> Hi, |
8 |
> |
9 |
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 07:40:59 +0800 Franklin Wang wrote: |
10 |
>> I'm not familiar with gentoo server and cluster. So could you tell me |
11 |
>> the experience about them? Thanks. |
12 |
> We have successful experience with Gentoo on both production servers |
13 |
> (someone call this area "enterprise", though I dislike such name) and |
14 |
> HPC setups. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> In short, |
17 |
> Procs: |
18 |
> - fine-tuned setups; |
19 |
> - really large choice of components; |
20 |
> - high-performance setups (especially rocks for HPC); |
21 |
> - reduced attack surface; |
22 |
> - nontrivial attack surface; |
23 |
> - large system updates easy (comparted to e.g. RHEL4 -> RHEL5 |
24 |
> migration); |
25 |
> - easier to add and maintain out-of-tree software. |
26 |
> Cons: |
27 |
> - much longer time for initial setup; |
28 |
> - harder to apply routine updates; |
29 |
> - poorly suitable for tasks like: "create me this new service ASAP |
30 |
> (for which you don't have prepared images), preferably yesterday". |
31 |
> Other notes: |
32 |
> - requires more qualified personnel to maintain. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Best regards, |
35 |
> Andrew Savchenko |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
skype:touch21st, Gtalk:touch21st, Yahoo/MSN:franklinwang36@×××××.com, |
39 |
Xing/Linkedin:Franklin Wang |