Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:09:25
Message-Id: 20070607000119.GF2575@nibiru.local
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid by Davi
1 * Davi <davividal@×××××××××××××.br> wrote:
2
3 Hi,
4
5 > Gentoo's Project needs more people to help in develop,
6 > docs and bugs... =)
7
8 Well, for me, it seemed quite different - new people are
9 unwelcomed, especially if the come with new/different ideas.
10
11 > IF this (bugs) are, as YOU said, trivial, go on... Help them...
12
13 I did. But I had to learn that this is totally unwelcomed.
14
15 > Teach them the right way! =)
16
17 No, I'm not the one who teaches anyody. I go my way, if you
18 like it, feel free to follow me, if you don't like it,
19 go you own but leave me alone.
20
21 I've shown several problems and concepts, but I was immediately
22 attacked. So the message is clear: I'm unwelcomed.
23
24 I don't see any reason for wasting more time on those folks.
25 That's the reason why I usually don't post on -dev anymore.
26 I still post on -users for those people who still might be
27 interested.
28
29
30 cu
31 --
32 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
33 Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
34 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
35 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
36 http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
37 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
38 http://patches.metux.de/
39 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
40 --
41 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid "b.n." <brullonulla@×××××.com>