| 1 |
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:29:24 -0600 |
| 2 |
»Q« <boxcars@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> In <news:49bf44f10702241819q687bdda1le058ab7c27c60b77@××××××××××.com>, |
| 5 |
> Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > > Thanks. I think it is not a good idea to call Firefox (for some |
| 8 |
> > > branding issue) its development codename. Maybe Gentoo should use |
| 9 |
> > > Debian's Iceweasel name. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > I agree. It's confusing that the brand-less name is the same as the |
| 12 |
> > development name. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I don't seen anything about it at bugs.gentoo.org; you could file a |
| 15 |
> bug. I'm not sure anyone would be motivated to patch it, though. As |
| 16 |
> it is now, (well, AIUI) the USE flag just controls the |
| 17 |
> --enable-official-branding switch for compiling and the "Bon Echo" you |
| 18 |
> see is just an artifact of the way Mozilla ships its source code. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I think something other than "Iceweasel" would be preferable, |
| 21 |
> since Debian and GNU both have Iceweasel projects. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
but 'IceWeasel' is ugly. Bon Echo is such a nice name. |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives