| 1 |
* Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> [110622 16:41]: |
| 2 |
> Matthew Finkel wrote: |
| 3 |
[...] |
| 4 |
> > Do correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't blas-reference pulled in by |
| 5 |
> > merging gcc with USE="fortran"? Or did you install blas-reference for |
| 6 |
> > another reason? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> No clue. I just -c'd some stuff and kept running revdep-rebuild and |
| 14 |
> emerge -uvDNa world until it all got sorted. It took a few times but I |
| 15 |
> finally got a clean result. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> The funny thing is this. I removed about 3 packages but had to install |
| 18 |
> close to a dozen to satisfy what was missing. Cantore, or something |
| 19 |
> like that, was left with no backend when I removed R. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> So, removed some bloat then installed some more bloat. Ain't that a peach? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Dale |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> :-) :-) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
No actually blas-reference fails to build unless gcc is built with the |
| 28 |
fortran use flag enabled (since there's no fortran compiler available.) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
The deps pulling in blas-reference are in my previous mail. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Todd |
Archives