1 |
Am 11.06.2014 12:41, schrieb thegeezer: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> everything around 380 MB/s ... only ~350 MB/s for |
4 |
>> /dev/vg01/winserver_disk0 (which still is nice) |
5 |
> |
6 |
> |
7 |
> OK here is the clue. |
8 |
> if the LVs are also showing such fast speed, then please can you show |
9 |
> your command that you are trying to run that is so slow ? |
10 |
|
11 |
I originally noticed that virt-backup was slow so I looked into it and |
12 |
found some dd-command. |
13 |
|
14 |
My tests right now are like this: |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
booze ~ # dd if=/dev/vg01/winserver_disk0 bs=1M of=/dev/null |
19 |
^C25+0 Datensätze ein |
20 |
24+0 Datensätze aus |
21 |
25165824 Bytes (25 MB) kopiert, 13,8039 s, 1,8 MB/s |
22 |
|
23 |
booze ~ # dd if=/dev/vg01/winserver_disk0 bs=4M of=/dev/null |
24 |
^C6+0 Datensätze ein |
25 |
5+0 Datensätze aus |
26 |
20971520 Bytes (21 MB) kopiert, 12,5837 s, 1,7 MB/s |
27 |
|
28 |
booze ~ # dd if=/dev/vg01/winserver_disk0 of=/dev/null |
29 |
^C55009+0 Datensätze ein |
30 |
55008+0 Datensätze aus |
31 |
28164096 Bytes (28 MB) kopiert, 12,611 s, 2,2 MB/s |
32 |
|
33 |
So no "copy from-to same disk here" ... should be just plain reading, right? |
34 |
|
35 |
virt-backup does some ionice-stuff as well, but as you see, my |
36 |
test-commands don't. |
37 |
|
38 |
# cat /sys/block/sdc/queue/scheduler |
39 |
[noop] deadline cfq |
40 |
|
41 |
-> noop scheduler to let the controller do its own scheduling |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
thanks, Stefan |