1 |
Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 8:10 PM Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> I went to Newegg. Hey, I buy stuff there sometimes. Anyway, I've |
4 |
>> looked at several routers and none of them mention IPv6 that I can |
5 |
>> find. I even skimmed the reviews and can't find a mention of it. Is |
6 |
>> there some secret way to know when IPv6 is supported? Is it called |
7 |
>> something else maybe? |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> IMO there are three reasonable approaches you can take towards getting |
10 |
> a router you won't curse yourself for buying a year from now: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> 1. DIY. PC or other general-purpose computing hardware with multiple |
13 |
> NICs. There are SBCs that work well for this. You can run pfsense or |
14 |
> some other router-oriented distro/software/wrappers. Or you can just |
15 |
> roll your own with netfilter and such. Max flexibility, but also max |
16 |
> fuss. Unless you use a SBC you'll also be paying a price in |
17 |
> electricity. Don't underestimate how much you pay for any x86-based |
18 |
> system that runs 24x7 - especially anything old you have lying around. |
19 |
|
20 |
I remember how my old rig pulled power. It pulled like 400 watts or so |
21 |
idle. Of course, it was lacking in power so when compiling, there |
22 |
wasn't a lot of difference really. In the winter, I rarely needed a |
23 |
heater. Its constant heat output kept this bedroom comfy. No real need |
24 |
for a heater. It's one reason I want to avoid this option. Mostly, I |
25 |
want something I'll get many years of service from and everything work |
26 |
well, wired or wireless now that I have a cell phone and printer that |
27 |
needs it. My current router pulls like 10 watts or something. |
28 |
Considering I run electric heat and such, it's a rounding error for me. |
29 |
Heck, my main puter is too. It pulls like 180 watts which includes |
30 |
everything, modem, router, monitor and the rig itself. |
31 |
|
32 |
The positive part tho for option 1, if another port is needed, just add |
33 |
a network card and it's done. With DHCP and friends, it will likely |
34 |
just work. That's something you can't do with a store bought router. |
35 |
Whatever it comes with, that's what you got. I've never needed more |
36 |
than the 4 most come with tho. My puter uses one, printer another and |
37 |
cell phone. I guess I have one left still. |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
> 2. OpenWRT/DD-WRT/etc. Again it is a bit fussy but generally way |
41 |
> less so than going pure DIY unless you're running pfsense or some |
42 |
> other appliance-oriented distro. If you go this route then definitely |
43 |
> check for recommendations on hardware that is known to work WELL. |
44 |
> Some stuff technically works but can be very prone to having to play |
45 |
> around with JTAG and such if you make the slightest mistake. You'll |
46 |
> probably spend an extra $20 on hardware you won't regret buying - do |
47 |
> it. |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
That's what I'm wanting as a option. I may just use the firmware that |
51 |
comes with the thing for a good while. Later on tho, if needed, I may |
52 |
switch to Openwrt or some other option that may work better. It's a |
53 |
option I'd like to have if possible. |
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
> 3. Something commercial that isn't terrible. There are various |
57 |
> options, but everybody always points to Ubiquiti and I'm mostly happy |
58 |
> with them. If you want something that is more gui-based I'd go with |
59 |
> their Unifi line. I'd avoid Amplifi as it is more consumer-oriented |
60 |
> and you'll end up being frustrated with it. EdgeOS is getting closer |
61 |
> to something like OpenWRT - it runs linux and you can get a shell and |
62 |
> mess around with the CLI. However, while the EdgeOS routing options |
63 |
> are great they aren't so good with WiFi and EdgeOS and Unifi don't |
64 |
> interoperate all that well (not impossible, but they don't really talk |
65 |
> to each other so you have to maintain two configs). I also really |
66 |
> dislike that the EdgeOS management software is only supplied as a |
67 |
> docker image, which is a pain if you're not using docker (one of these |
68 |
> days I'll have to get it working with my bridge interface as it always |
69 |
> tries to create its own and ends up having no physical network |
70 |
> access). The Unifi controller software is packaged for a couple of |
71 |
> distros which makes it much more flexible to deploy (and you can use |
72 |
> it on docker if you wish). |
73 |
> |
74 |
> Personally I'm running EdgeOS on my router and Unifi on everything |
75 |
> else. If I could go back I might have gone with Unifi on the gateway |
76 |
> but it does bug me that it is so much more expensive and does the same |
77 |
> thing. If I had it then end-to-end VLAN/etc would be much more |
78 |
> practical, though I'd need a pile of managed switches to make it work |
79 |
> well. |
80 |
> |
81 |
> I've run all three options at various points. Unless your needs are |
82 |
> special I think there is value in just going with #3. It just runs |
83 |
> itself for the most part, and if you want multiple access points or |
84 |
> anything like that the network basically runs itself. I just plug in |
85 |
> new hardware and then on the controller software it shows up, and one |
86 |
> click provisions it which configures it to fit in with all my global |
87 |
> settings. |
88 |
> |
89 |
|
90 |
|
91 |
This is why I might buy one compatible with Openwrt but wait until the |
92 |
wireless stuff gets sorted out. Like I said above, I'd like it as a |
93 |
option so finding one that Openwrt supports should increase my odds if |
94 |
they get everything working nicely later on. I still remember the old |
95 |
USB days when it was new. It was buggy and stuff didn't work right |
96 |
every time. After a while tho, they got most the kinks worked out. I |
97 |
think Openwrt and others will do the same. It may take a bit but maybe |
98 |
by the time I'm ready to try it, it will be awesomeness. |
99 |
|
100 |
I just want to avoid replacing my current router with a router that also |
101 |
doesn't have IPv6 support and has limited options later on. Even google |
102 |
isn't helping me much on that. |
103 |
|
104 |
Thanks. |
105 |
|
106 |
Dale |
107 |
|
108 |
:-) :-) |