| 1 |
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 18 May 2011 22:28:38 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:06 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did |
| 4 |
>> opine |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> thusly: |
| 7 |
>> > Had a depclean session which removed: |
| 8 |
>> > media-libs/musicbrainz |
| 9 |
>> > |
| 10 |
>> > selected: 2.1.5 |
| 11 |
>> > |
| 12 |
>> > protected: none |
| 13 |
>> > |
| 14 |
>> > omitted: 3.0.2 |
| 15 |
>> > |
| 16 |
>> > Then I followed up with revdep-rebuild and this comes up: |
| 17 |
>> > * Generated new 1_files.rr |
| 18 |
>> > * Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH |
| 19 |
>> > * Generated new 2_ldpath.rr |
| 20 |
>> > * Checking dynamic linking consistency |
| 21 |
>> > |
| 22 |
>> > [ 67% ] * broken /usr/lib/libtunepimp.la (requires -lmusicbrainz) |
| 23 |
>> > [snip ...] |
| 24 |
>> > |
| 25 |
>> > * Assigning files to packages |
| 26 |
>> > * !!! /usr/lib/libtunepimp.la not owned by any package is broken !!! |
| 27 |
>> > * /usr/lib/libtunepimp.la -> (none) |
| 28 |
>> > |
| 29 |
>> > What is "-lmusicbrainz" and is it telling me to just delete |
| 30 |
>> > /usr/lib/libtunepimp.la? |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>> Look into any *.la file and you will see stuff like this: |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
>> /usr/lib/libsqlite3.la:dependency_libs=' -ldl -lpthread' |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
>> The .la files are hints to the linker telling it how to do stuff, the -l |
| 37 |
>> bits reference libraries that will be needed. Far more often than is |
| 38 |
>> acceptable, libtool cocks this up in spectacular ways, which is why we had |
| 39 |
>> |
| 40 |
>> lafilefixer --justfixit |
| 41 |
>> |
| 42 |
>> for so long, and why it is now built into portage. |
| 43 |
>> |
| 44 |
>> I have musicbrainz, but I do not have /usr/lib/libtunepimp.la and yours is |
| 45 |
>> orphaned anyway - it probably got left behind long ago when depclean didn't |
| 46 |
>> know it was related to musicbrainz. |
| 47 |
>> |
| 48 |
>> Just delete the thing, be done with it, revdep-rebuild will stfu and you |
| 49 |
>> will be a much happier chappy |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
> Thanks guys, it's been blitzed! |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
I think the long-term plan is to eliminate the *.la files entirely, |
| 54 |
once all packages have been updated as such by their maintainers, so |
| 55 |
hopefully this kind of problem will vanish in the not-too-distant |
| 56 |
future. :) |
Archives