| 1 |
On Monday 09 July 2007 11:44, Philip Webb wrote: |
| 2 |
> (1a) I'm confused by the CPU features '65 nm' & '90 nm': |
| 3 |
> yes, I know they refer to tiny distances, |
| 4 |
> but would expect the faster CPU to have the smaller distance, |
| 5 |
> whereas the opposite is true for those listed (AMD docs don't mention |
| 6 |
Technological process(those numbers like 65nm and 90nm) does not affect CPU |
| 7 |
speed. T.p. affects on max CPU clock frequency for this tech process(i.e. for |
| 8 |
this CPU series) and total dissipated power(i.e. TDP, those that are 65W and |
| 9 |
89W) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> (1h) The store will probably confirm whether the power supply is adequate. |
| 12 |
I have AMD X2 4400+ (89W or more - don't remember exactly), ASUS GeForce |
| 13 |
EN7950GT, two harddisks - WD-160 PATA and WD-200 SATA, two DVD drives |
| 14 |
(DVD-ROM/CD-RW and DVD/CD-RW), motherboard - ASUS A8NE. And,you know, my 300W |
| 15 |
power supply is OK with all of it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Good luck! |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
best regards, |
| 22 |
Aleksey V. Kunitskiy |
| 23 |
my public GPG/PGP key: http://www.alexey-kv.org.ua/pubkey.asc |
Archives