1 |
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 10:29:19 BST Philip Webb wrote: |
2 |
> (1) I've tested 'iscan' & the result is the same failure as 'xsane'. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> (2) I've checked the contents of /etc/sane.d as they are now, |
5 |
> as they were at my last back-up before 180626 (when scanning worked) |
6 |
> & as they are in the Mint partition, where scanning still works : |
7 |
> there's no significant difference between the 3 versions. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> (3) Following one suggestion, I tried renaming ~/.sane , |
10 |
> but that makes no difference either. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> (4) I've run 'strace' with 'iscan' & on the Mint system : |
13 |
> the output is at http://chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/xsane-trace.d1 |
14 |
> & the other 2 "trace" files there. The Mint version seems to find |
15 |
> a file in /usr/share/iscan-data , which the others don't find, |
16 |
> but that file is present in my Gentoo system. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Does anyone have experience interpreting Strace output files ? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> When I updated the kernel recently, I also had to update Nvidia-drivers. |
21 |
> Is it possible that that could have affected Xsane + Iscan ? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> This really is a puzzle : any further suggestions are very welcome. |
24 |
> Thanks again for the others so far. |
25 |
|
26 |
I can't recall if you mentioned any differences in the kernel versions and |
27 |
their configs between Gentoo and Mint? |
28 |
|
29 |
Have you compared the strace outputs between Gentoo and Mint too to see if |
30 |
anything stands out? |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Regards, |
34 |
Mick |