Archives
Archives
| From: | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] IP Load Sharing - Per Packet Load Balancing (Linux router) | ||
| Date: | Mon, 27 May 2013 08:15:20 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201305270914.55098.michaelkintzios@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] IP Load Sharing - Per Packet Load Balancing (Linux router) by Nick Khamis |
||
| 1 | On Monday 27 May 2013 01:16:31 Nick Khamis wrote: |
| 2 | > By downstream, I mean within our own network. Obviously downstream LB |
| 3 | > from the ISP's DSLAM would be impossible without MLPP, BGP support... |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > N |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I think that the CONFIG_BONDING option in the kernel will help you do what you |
| 8 | want. Have a look at /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt |
| 9 | |
| 10 | http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-bond-or-team-multiple-network-interfaces-nic-into-single-interface.html |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Without bonding, using Trivial/True link equaliser (teql) you could try |
| 14 | something like this: |
| 15 | |
| 16 | http://compton.nu/2009/12/per-packet-load-balancing-with-linux/ |
| 17 | |
| 18 | http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.loadshare.html |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | From a cursory look the kernel bonding seems to be the latest method of doing |
| 22 | this. Please let us know what you come up with as the best method for |
| 23 | achieving what you want. |
| 24 | -- |
| 25 | Regards, |
| 26 | Mick |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |