Archives
Archives
| From: | Daniel Pielmeier <billie@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] USE ruby_targets_ruby20 | ||
| Date: | Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:56:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAJnEOsj_M-3yF-gNokTc2vdC8T3eedmpHO4xVWdZ2fVPvyHV0g@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] USE ruby_targets_ruby20 by Adam Carter |
||
| 1 | 2013/11/15 Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com> |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > Not an answer to your question, but yesterday ruby got pulled in by an |
| 4 | update to thin-provisioning-tools, which was required by lvm2. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | It looks like ruby is only required for the tests of |
| 8 | sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools [1]. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 reflects this. So if you |
| 11 | update to this version and don't use FEATURES="test" it should not pull in |
| 12 | ruby anymore. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | [1] |
| 15 | http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools/ChangeLog?r1=1.26&r2=1.27 |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | Regards |
| 19 | Daniel Pielmeier |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] USE ruby_targets_ruby20 | Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] USE ruby_targets_ruby20 | Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> |