| 1 |
On 08/10/2016 10:48 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 10 Aug 2016 08:27:53 james wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Any hints on using this net-misc/openntpd ? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> No, but have you thought of using chrony instead? It's served me well for |
| 7 |
> many years and I don't get any impression of bloat. That's just an informal |
| 8 |
> opinion; I haven't looked into it closely. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I may look into that later. Right now, I just need something easy and |
| 12 |
lightweight, that works across system, VM, containers and embedded |
| 13 |
systems. Openntp seems to be fine for that. I may look at chrony at a |
| 14 |
later date, if openntp fails for unknown reasons. It is pretty small |
| 15 |
and quite simple, so it does meet my needs, atm. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Later on, I may need to test a variety of ntp daemons against musl and |
| 18 |
maybe some other glibc replacements, but not now. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
thx, |
| 22 |
James |
Archives