Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps repeating the same steps

[1126]

On Fri, 25. May 13:47, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:41 PM, 1126
> <mailinglists@××××××××××××××××××.de> wrote:
> > Hello list!
> >
> > When I run revdep-rebuild, it keeps repeating the same steps over and over
> > again.
> >
> > Here is what I mean:
> >
> >  * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild
> >
> >  * Checking reverse dependencies
> >  * Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package update
> >  * will be emerged.
> >
> >  * Collecting system binaries and libraries
> >  * Generated new 1_files.rr
> >  * Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> >  * Generated new 2_ldpath.rr
> >  * Checking dynamic linking consistency
> > [ 36% ]  *   broken /usr/lib32/libavdevice.so.53.4.100 (requires
> > libpulse-simple.so.0
> > libpulse.so.0)
> > [ 100% ]
> >  * Generated new 3_broken.rr
> >  * Assigning files to packages
> >  *   /usr/lib32/libavdevice.so.53.4.100 ->
> > app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs
> >  * Generated new 4_raw.rr and 4_owners.rr
> >  * Cleaning list of packages to rebuild
> >  * Generated new 4_pkgs.rr
> >  * Assigning packages to ebuilds
> >  * Generated new 4_ebuilds.rr
> >  * Evaluating package order
> >  * Generated new 5_order.rr
> >  * All prepared. Starting rebuild
> > emerge --complete-graph=y --oneshot   app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs:0
> > ..........
> > Calculating dependencies... done!
> >
> >>>> Verifying ebuild manifests
> >
> >>>> Emerging (1 of 1) app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520
> >  * emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520.tar.xz RMD160 SHA1 SHA256 size ;-) ...
> > [ ok ]
> >>>> Unpacking source...
> >>>> Unpacking emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520.tar.xz to
> > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work
> >>>> Source unpacked in
> > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work
> >>>> Preparing source in
> > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work ...
> >>>> Source prepared.
> >>>> Configuring source in
> > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work ...
> >>>> Source configured.
> >>>> Compiling source in
> > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work ...
> >>>> Source compiled.
> >>>> Test phase [not enabled]: app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520
> >
> >>>> Install emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520 into
> > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/image/ category
> > app-emulation
> >>>> Completed installing emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520 into
> > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/image/
> >
> >
> >  * QA Notice: The following files contain runtime text relocations
> >  *  Text relocations force the dynamic linker to perform extra
> >  *  work at startup, waste system resources, and may pose a security
> >  *  risk.  On some architectures, the code may not even function
> >  *  properly, if at all.
> >  *  For more information, see http://hardened.gentoo.org/pic-fix-guide.xml
> >  *  Please include the following list of files in your report:
> >  * TEXTREL usr/lib32/libx264.so.120
> >
> >
> >>>> Installing (1 of 1) app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520
> >>>> Auto-cleaning packages...
> >
> >>>> No outdated packages were found on your system.
> >
> >  * GNU info directory index is up-to-date.
> >  * Build finished correctly. Removing temporary files...
> >  * You can re-run revdep-rebuild to verify that all libraries and binaries
> >  * are fixed. Possible reasons for remaining inconsistencies include:
> >  *   orphaned files
> >  *   deep dependencies
> >  *   packages installed outside of portage's control
> >  *   specially-evaluated libraries
> >
> >
> > It keeps complaining about libavdevice.so and them re-emerges
> > app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520.
> >
> >
> > When I would re-run it right now, it would again complain about libavdevice and
> > would again re-emerge app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs..
> >
> > Has anyone any idea how to fix this?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Christian.
> >
> >
>
> This is bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416751
>
> Bugzilla+search is your friend ;)
>

Thanks, a friend I somehow forgot to ask this time ;)